Wednesday, April 13, 2016

HOW ABOUT CREATING A "COMMON SENSE ZONE"?



It's enough to make you think that you are in some sort of a Twilight Zone. There are a plethora of so-called "free zones" emerging throughout the United States. Most are in reaction to dangers, some real and most imagined. For example, there are "gun free zones", the misnamed "free speech zone, and now "tech free zones"! This blog will not discuss the wussy pussy "safe zones" for snowflake millennials. That will be discussed in a future post.

The Pop Tart Pistol is especially
dangerous to diabetics.
Gun Free Zones

"Gun free zones" are self-explanatory. But they are also  "zero tolerance" zones. And this intolerance includes such benign "weaponry" as toy guns, squirt guns, and Pop Tarts bitten into the shape of a gun. No guns, real or otherwise, are to be brandished by ANYONE, that is, except for the campus gunman. The most ridiculous aspect of "gun free zones" is that the ban includes campus security. There's an old saying, "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."  So too are armed gunman "kings" terrorizing campuses or movie theaters. And yet, the stupid question is still asked as to how could this have been prevented?

Free Speech Zones

More troubling are the so-called "free speech zones", especially those located on college campuses. Student Nicole Sanders is the plaintiff in a free speech lawsuit against Blinn College in Texas.* Her lawsuit challenges the college restricting speech to a specific “Free Speech Zone” on campus. Her suit resulted from an incident where Sanders was accosted by a college administrator and three armed police officers. She was advocating for a conceal-carry policy to be instated on campus.

     Sanders was informed by the administrator that she needed "special permission" to advocate for a "conceal carry policy" on campus and to recruit members for a student organization that she was forming. The college administration dragged their collective feet for six weeks allegedly to approve a simple card that she was going to hand out to fellow students. What was the incendiary message on the card that the administration was exercising content control over? It was an explanation of the 4th and 5th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

     While it is settled law that free speech can be regulated as to time, place, and manner; such regulation must be reasonable. According to the Wikipedia article on free speech:

"Freedom of speech is also sometimes limited to so-called free speech zones, which can take the form of a wire fence enclosure, barricades, or an alternative venue designed to segregate speakers according to the content of their message. There is much controversy surrounding the creation of these areas – the mere existence of such zones is offensive to some people, who maintain that the First Amendment makes the entire country an unrestricted free speech zone. Civil libertarians often claim that Free Speech Zones are used as a form of censorship and public relations management to conceal the existence of popular opposition from the mass public and elected officials... " [Citations omitted.]**

But if Sanders didn’t get prior permission to express her views as required by the college, she was limited to expressing her views only in the “Free Speech Area” on the campus. The prescribed zone is about 16 feet long and 11 feet wide. It is approximately the size of a  parking space for a college president. Talk about control and containment! Such free speech zones are more like  containment areas to quarantine diseased animals. 

     I recall the so-called "free speech area" at Southwestern Junior College, which I attended in late 1960s-70s. The area was away from the main campus quad and located near a parking lot on undeveloped land adjacent to the Art Department. The late 1960s-70s were the days of the Vietnam War protests. It was very clear to anyone with a pulse that the object of the "free speech area" was to isolate and contain student dissent. It apparently worked because the "free speech  area" was primarily used to stage garage rock band performances hired by the puppet student government to entertain students during the "College Hour".

     "College Hour" was from 11 am until 12 noon. It was designed to bring students and faculty together in harmony and in various academic combinations, e.g., study groups, professor-student conferences, and rock bands! Protests faded after the draft lotteries of 1969 and 1970. Those lucky students with "safe" lottery draft numbers were free thereafter to listen to bad rock music without fear of involuntary military service. So much for (self-) righteously indignant dissent. So to paraphrase an old saying, it seemed that music, even bad music, does and did soothe the savage breast of protest. [Ed. note: The saying is attributed to William Congreve and is correctly stated as,  "Musick has charms to soothe a savage breast," this is often misquoted as "Music soothes the savage beast ...]

Tech Free Zones

From CBSNew York comes a report that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children aged two years and older should be limited to only hours a day in front of a screen (TV, iPad, tablet, etc.) and zero face time for children under two.** The article also quotes Dr. Ari Brown as recommending that parents, “Have tech-free zones. So "tech-free zones" might be meals times and definitely the bedroom.”

     The CBSNewYork report also noted that Pediatricians say studies have shown that excessive media use can lead to attention problems, sleep disorders, and obesity." We get that now with adults.  The term "couch potato" (code for "fat ass") has become a part of the cultural lexicon.

     We've all seen the YouTube video of the engrossed young woman falling into a fountain while texting.  This compendium of texting calamities is instructive and amusing.



The video is preceded by a "Don't text while driving" message, alerting young drivers of the dangers of texting. To add to the dangers of texting while driving, there is also a medical condition called "text neck". 

     According to an article*** in the Blaze,  "[Text neck] occurs because the joints and tissue in the neck are not built to withstand being flexed for long periods, and spending hours peering down at a screen puts them under too much stress."

     A survey reported by the Blaze, found that the average American sends 41.5 text messages per day.  The 18-24 age group sends 109.5 texts per day. the Blaze concluded that "... this is a lot of time hunched over a small screen and research is saying it's beginning to round out its own medical condition: the text neck." It's also a lot of wasted time sending grammatically awful messages.

     Many other maladies have come about or have been exacerbated because of technology, e.g.,  our old friend, carpal tunnel syndrome, circulation problems from sitting in front of a computer too long, and even blindness from staring too much at a computer screen.


Proposal: Create Common Sense Zones

Most of the above-mentioned problems are created by lack of common sense like, e.g., establishing "gun free zone" where armed bad actors can terrify innocent civilians and unarmed security guards or where distracted people fall into plaza fountains while texting. Common sense zones should be created to allow people to exercise good judgment. But what are the chances of establishing "common sense zones" in America? Answer: Slim and None and Slim just left town.







___________________________________
Sources

*Wikipedia article, Freedom of Speech in the United States, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States#Time.2C_place.2C_and_manner_restrictions.

**CBSNewYork, Pediatricians Recommend ‘Tech-Free’ Zones To Cut Back On Screen Time For Tots, http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/04/11/children-technology-time/.

***The Blaze, New Medical Condition From Too Much Texting?, http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/10/11/new-medical-condition-from-too-much-texting/

Monday, April 11, 2016

HOLD YOUR NOSES FOR JUST ONE MORE TIME...



People are losing sight of the importance of this year's presidential election. At stake is the transformation of a representative republic into a Socialist/Fascist state laced with the Third World patina of brutal tyranny and abject poverty. The election of Hillary Clinton for a third term of the Obama policies would be an unmitigated disaster for freedom and democracy.

A minor delay on the road to serfdom.
     Her opponent the in Democrat  primaries, Socialist Bernie Sanders has two chances of overtaking Clinton-- Slim and None, and Slim just left town.  The Democrat establishment has jury rigged the process so that with the hand-picked "Super Delegates" in her wide hip pocket, Clinton is all but assured of the nomination. This is also in compensation for the party's gift of the nomination in 2008, to Barack Obama. The gift to Obama was not because the Democrat seriously believes in racial equality-- they don't. It was so that the Democrats could have cover to implement their destructive agenda under cover of a racism against our guy shield. Any criticism of the Democrat agenda would be attributed to the mostly imagined racism against Obama by the critics. Democrats are now attempting to replicate the same political protectionist strategy using sexism against a woman to protect their malevolent agenda. Democrats always put party before country and people.   

    What is particularly galling is that Hillary Clinton is a putative felon and sociopath. Sociopath is not a term to be thrown around lightly. Her lies and unbridled ethical lapses notwithstanding, her greed has lead her to influence peddling and money laundering via the Clinton Foundation. But it is her endorsement of unrestricted abortion on demand that speaks volumes about her lack of respect for the sanctity of human life. If someone has such little regard for the lives of the most helpless of living beings, they cannot be too far removed from giving an order to institute a "Final Solution" for political enemies or for pesky social problems.   That half of the legal voting population would even consider voting for such a morally inert person for the highest office in the land is disheartening and speaks lowly of the American electorate. Even more galling is that the corruption of the Obama Justice Department may spare her from donning the orange jump suit that she so richly deserves. There are people that have served serious jail time for less than what Hillary is alleged to have done. Yet, there she is, the front runner for the Democrat nomination for President of the United States. 

     But I'm not particularly enthused over a choice between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump to counter the danger of a Hillary Clinton régime. Each man fills me with discomfort as to their abilities to do justice to the office. Maybe it's because I have a naïve view of the Presidency, i.e., the man or woman that fills the job should be larger than life. Names like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight D.  Eisenhower, and Ronald Reagan all come to mind. Yes, I omitted Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR). But that was on purpose because the FDR initiated the decline of the United States into crypto-Socialist status. Other Presidents have done some individually great things, but their character flaws or political missteps prevented them from being inducted into the Pantheon of great Presidents 

     What is dismaying about the G.O.P. primary process has been the childish bickering of the two front runners. But this was a common occurrence throughout the G.O.P. primary process. The absolute silliness of making Carly Fiorina's face a campaign issue was silly. (As an aside, smart women like Fiorina have always made me weak in the knees. Hence, they are sexy. Even though she's "older", Barbara Corcoran of the "Shark Tank" TV show is another hottie.)  Then there was the silliness over the size of Trump's hands by Marco Rubio implying somehow that Trump's manhood was sub par.  This caused me to not take Rubio seriously as being mature enough for the big job of being President of the United States.

     Donald Trump cries like a little girl over the "unfairness" of the G.O.P. establishment. Donald, you're always bragging about what a "tough businessman" you are. Well, okay you're now in the rough and tumble world of partisan politics. You're a smart guy. So if you don't know what to do in this terra nova, then hire people that do know. Stop acting like some retired Navy Chief with his rules of personal engagement: i.e.: (1) the Chief is always right, (2) if the Chief is wrong, then Rule No. (1) applies. You are not infallible Donald. Start acting like a serious candidate instead of a spoiled brat that isn't getting his way, i.e., "Don't you know who I am?"

     Ted Cruz is another case. We all know he's scary smart as his Harvard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz has affirmed. But somehow something is missing. Maybe a personality transplant is in order. It would not have to be much more complicated than transplanting the personality of a rutabaga to Cruz for him to be able to defeat either the screechy crone, Hillary Clinton or the Babbling Bolshevik Bernie Sanders. Neither of the two Democrat contenders offer much more than warmed over borscht from a Communist party cell meeting.

     I didn't mention John Kasich earlier on purpose because he's math challenged in his thinking that he's got a shot at the nomination. We don't need a math dummy as President or any dummy for that matter. Kasich is so delusional that he seriously thinks that he'll leapfrog over Trump and Cruz for the nomination. The postman's son always annoys at least twice.

*  *  *  *  *  
So what do we make of this? It seems that this November, it's  business as usual. And just as in 1996, 2008, and 2012, I'll be holding my nose one more time as I vote. But this time it's really different, I'm voting as if my life depends on it. So should you because it does.