Dr. Strangevote or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Vote Fraud.

Republicans are looking forward to the 2010 elections as a referendum to undo the Liberal-Fascist changes wrought by the Democrat/Liberal-Fascist troika of "Broke" Obama, "Nazi" Pelosi, and "Scary" Reid.  Unfortunately, the Republican faith in the electoral process may well be misplaced.  Democrooks have perfected the art of vote fraud.  (Socialists always talk about perfecting man, countries, society, etc.)  With a compliant media in tow, Democrooks can be as sloppy as can be perpetrating voter fraud without fear of scrutiny by the Pravda-inspired lame stream media.  What used to be a joke, e.g., vote early and often, is no longer a laughing matter. Our liberty is in danger.  Our country as we know it is being radically changed much like cancerous cells metastasizing into an ugly death.  We need to ensure that those that vote in American elections have the right and the proper qualifications to vote and that their votes are counted fairly and honestly.

As we rapidly decend into third world nationhood,we should think hard about how we want to run our future elections.  On the one hand there is the Hugo Chavez/Iranian model in which opposition candidates are routinely disqualified and voting machines are rigged.  Unless we act soon that may be coming to a registrar of voters near you. On the other hand there is the Al Franken model in which elections are changed at the vote counting station. This is an emerging trend as Democrats get ahold of the election process.  According to a Fox News opinion piece: 

When voters woke up on Wednesday morning after the election, Senator Norm Coleman led Al Franken by what seemed like a relatively comfortable 725 votes. By Wednesday night, that lead had shrunk to 477. By Thursday night, it was down to 336. By Friday, it was 239. Late Sunday night, the difference had gone down to just 221 -- a total change over 4 days of 504 votes. Amazingly, this all has occurred even though there hasn’t even yet been a recount. Just local election officials correcting claimed typos in how the numbers were reported. Counties will certify their results today, and their final results will be sent to the secretary of state by Friday. The actual recount won’t even start until November 19...Virtually all of Franken’s new votes came from just three out of 4130 precincts, and almost half the gain (246 votes) occurred in one precinct -- Two Harbors, a small town north of Duluth along Lake Superior -- a heavily Democratic precinct where Obama received 64 percent of the vote. None of the other races had any changes in their vote totals in that precinct. [NN: Does this sound familiar? Didn't the problems in Floraduh during the 2000 election come from Democrook precincts?]

And how do we solve the problem of "newly discovered" ballots that emerge whenever a Democrat needs some added votes to win an election such as happened in the 2004 Gubernatorial race in Washington State?  One way might be to initiate stringent "chain of custody" rules for all election ballot activities that is similar to the way that legal evidence is handled in criminal cases. There are multiple definitions for chain of custody.  But to paraphase Wikipedia's definition, chain of custody rules would mean that there would be chronological documentation, i.e., a paper trail, showing the custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of all ballots, physical or electronic.  Vermont has such a procedure for optically scanned ballots. 

As an aside, while it's nice for cash-strapped governments to have unpaid volunteers working the polling place--every person involved in the election process should be subject to a background check, credit check and fingerprinted. There should also be severe criminal penalities, i.e., mandatory jail time, for any ballot tampering.

In the 2004 City of San Diego Mayorial election, 5,551 write-in votes for Councilwoman and surfing enthusiast Donna Frye were invalidated because those voters did not fill-in the bubble next to Donna Frye's written in name as required by the California election laws.  Had those votes been counted Frye would have beaten Dick Murphy handily.  The local ABC TV affliate Channel 10 and USA Today came up with a poll that indicated that 60% of those polled thought that the write-in ballots should have been counted.  The vox populi, as usual was emotional rather than following the American concept that we are a nation of laws not men (and women). Assuming that the 5,551 write-in ballots weren't a part of an incompetently executed ballot stuffing scheme; Frye seemed to have broad voter support especially with such a feckless incumbent like Dick Murphy.  Murphy was later named by Time Magazine as one of the three worst mayors in the United States.

According to the Frye-Friendly Surfer Mag:

Due to the late announcement of her candidacy, Frye’s name did not appear on the ballot. Instead, she was a write-in candidate, a situation which historically does not bode well for those seeking election to a major office. No major office candidate has been elected as a write-in in San Diego since 1982, however, the Frye campaign has done a remarkable job of educating voters on how to cast a write-in ballot, and the results so far have been favorable for the campaign.

So what happened?  Well, but for 5,551 dunderheads that didn't pay attention to the Frye campaign instructions and the California State Election law about write-in candidates, she would have been Mayor of San Diego.  Perhaps many of the 5,551 voters were transplants from Floriduh where the voters were also equally confused by plain English (and other languages) ballots issued in Democrook counties.  Perhaps a literacy test or even a standard intelligence test would be in order for potential voters. I can almost hear the Democrooks crying foul because either test would discriminate against the traditional Democrook voting bases of felons, the dead, those in insane asylums, and Non-English speaking illegals.

But what about voter ID cards with biometric indicators?  Know this, biometric identification is not without its problems, e.g., "...an individual with a disability may not possess the biological characteristic required for a scan or may be unable to position themselves for a scan." 

Democrats routinely charge that voter IDs would be used to suppress minority and other "traditionally" disenfranchised voters.  Do they mean disenfranchised voters like illegal aliens and felons trying to vote for the Democrook of the DNC's choice?  According to one commentator:

[NN: The right to vote] is now endangered unless there are adequate safeguards against voter fraud such as Indiana’s voter ID law. As former Minnesota Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer warned recently, “In this day of illegals’ potentially gaining access to the driver’s license system, the verification of citizenship and accuracy of the connection of the ID card to the person voting is only common sense. Anyone who thinks that there is no stealing of votes should go home and next time don’t lock their doors or cars when leaving.”

John Fund of the Wall Street Journal, writes about the electoral process in Mexico and believes that the United States could learn a thing or two about running a clean election from Mexico:

Mexico has developed an elaborate system of safeguards to prevent voter fraud. Absentee ballots, which are cast outside the view of election officials and represent the easiest way to commit fraud, are much harder to apply for than in the U.S. Voters must present a valid voter ID card with a photo and imbedded security codes. After they cast a ballot voters--just like those famously pictured in Iraq last year--also have a finger or thumb dipped in indelible purple ink to prevent them from voting again.

In the U.S. opponents [NN: read Democrooks] of such anti-fraud measures as photo ID laws claim they will disenfranchise many voters and reduce voter turnout. But John Lott, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, notes that in the three presidential elections Mexico has conducted since the National Election Commission reformed the election laws "68% of eligible citizens have voted, compared to only 59% in the three elections prior to the rule changes." People are more likely to vote if they believe their ballot will be fairly counted.

So once again we return to the issue of how we go about counting ballots.  As we've seen, just about every voting method is susceptable to tampering.  The only safeguard for our voting process would be citizens that demand that their elected representatives install safeguards like voter IDs, election worker vetting, and strict chain of custody rules. Anything less leaves us at the mercy of Democrook Party Bosses.

Have we evolved?

I'm shocked, shocked that a do nothing like Obama can win the Nobel Prize Peace Prize!

OBAMA "WINS" NOBEL PRIZE

When Theodore Roosevelt won the Nobel Prize in 1906, it was for among other things, stopping a war between Russia and Japan in 1905.  In 1902, President Roosevelt took the initiative in opening the international Court of Arbitration at The Hague, by submitting a dispute between the United States and Mexico. Roosevelt also led the way in using arbitration to solve international problems in the Western Hemisphere.

When Woodrow Wilson won the Nobel Prize in 1919, it was for championing the creation of the League of Nations. His vision for world peace was embodied in his Fourteen Points that outlined a bold vision of world peace and, for better or worse laid the foundation for the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I.

When Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Prize in 2002, it was more of a lifetime achievement award for trying real hard and for swinging a hammer for Habitat for Humanity (HFH).  Unfortunately, many of the HFH houses are falling apart.  But as we entered the New Milleneum it's feelings, not achievement, that count the most. This is because world has become more feminized.  So now we should all just hold each other, eat some Ben & Jerry's ice cream, watch Oprah and hope for change.

When Barack Obama won the Nobel Prize in 2009, well, we're not really sure why he won it. Was it the good intentions espoused by his teleprompter?  Some critics wondered why Obama was chosen for the award so early in his Presidency.  "So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far. He is still at an early stage," said 1983 winner, Lech Walesa.  The Wall Street Journal online, quoted Siv Jensen, leader of the Norway's Progress Party as saying,  "It is just too soon. It is wrong to give him the peace prize for his ambition. You should receive it for results." The better question how can a man running (sic) a war in two nations be given a prize for peace?

Maybe it's a reward from Euro-Socialists for beginning the deconstruction of the United States in the nine months that the man child has been the POTUS.  In his acceptance remarks this morning Obama justified his receipt of the award as a "call to action" in anticipation of the his fantasized future  accomplishments. Obama might have been comparing himself to then West German Chancellor Willy Brandt who got the award in 1971 for Ostpolitik, or the normalization of relations with East Germany.  History will show that that normailization happened chiefly because of Ronald Reagan's tough policies against Communism and not Brandt's asperations toward normalized relations with then-East Germany.  It is more likely that Brandt got the award, as did Carter, as a lifetime achievement award.  

Problematic with Obama's award is that nominations for the Peace Prize closed two weeks after Obama was nominated.  That leaves about two weeks of peacemaking that Obama needed to accomplish to deserve the award.  There were certainly no good works toward peace done by Obama.  Prior to being elected President, Obama was a U.S. Senator from 2005 to 2008, of which he showed up to work a total of 143 days. Before that he was Illinois State Senator in which he registered 193 votes of "Present."  He was a community organizer, a law professor and civil rights attorney before his political career began in 1997.  But there has never been evidence of Obama having produced any shred of significant legal scholarhip--not even in the area of international law.  So what's the justification for the award?  Maybe "Meester Beeg" could have bought the undeserved award for his personal political and economic puppet.  Buying Socialists is easy. They are highly corruptable even though they lie about being for the little guy. Just look at the corrupt plutocrats in the Democrat party such as "Nazi" Pelosi. She takes every government perq available and then some, just like the guy that takes every free food sample offered at the local Costco.

Perhaps the end of days are upon us.  For sure it is the beginning of the end for the United States if Barack Obama and George Soros have anything to say about it.

Jack Webb Schools Roman Polansky on Sex with Minors

Watch this YouTube video parody in which Jack "Joe Friday" Webb "schools" Roman Polansky on child molestation.  Listen to Roman Polansky cry crocodile tears as he defends himself.  Give that man an Oscar and a jail cell. Then look at the list of the Hollyweird types supporting Polansky.  No doubt these morally inert individuals would also approve of the Hollywood casting couch.  Do yourself and the country a favor and do not put one thin dime into their pockets by attending their movies, concerts, plays, etc., and by not watching them on television.  Yeah, I'm calling for a boycott.  So what!  Didn't the gays do that to Dr. Laura and Anita Bryant?  That was okay with the Liberal Fascist elite.  Why not us? Remember folks, you'd be exercising your First Amendment right to free speech just as the Anti-War mobs, Gays, Code Pink, Rent-a Mobs, and Moveon.Org do in far more disruptive and vulgar fashion.

Keep Your Worldwide Pants Zipped / Ignorance of the Law is an Excuse... Sometimes

Why do these people still have media jobs?

Why is David Letterman still on the air?  The guy is a moral and intellectual albatross. There are some TV critics that feel that CBS is suppressing Letterman's admission last Thursday at the expense of the First Amendment.  As an aside, the ever oily Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) once likened right wing talk radio to pornography to be regulated like pornography.  Well, Senator the indiscreet semi-porn star Letterman broadcasts his sexual affairs and sexually slanders Sarah Palin's underage daughter by joking about her getting pregnant.  What about that?  Letterman expects laughs and high ratings for his crude humor and now sordid personal life.  Yet, the hypocitical Letterman indirectly asked the public to respect his privacy by saying he's not going to talk about his sexual peccadillos anymore.  Well, that didn't last very long because he's still talking about it. It's also getting his creep show some high ratings in the competition for late night viewers.

In reality Letterman is nothing more than a media stooge for the DNC doing the dirty work of destroying the lives of their political opponents.  But know this Dave, they'll throw you under the bus in a "New York minute" when you're no longer of any use to them.  Meanwhile, the Stooge will continue to issue his insincere apologies in hopes of maintaining his current big ratings.  It seems that the insincere apologies shtick comes easy to the Stooge.  This is the same Stooge that described Sarah Palin as dressing like a slutty flight attendant.  According to the news summary article by Liz Barratt in the Spokane Examiner.com:

The New York Post called David Letterman a skirt-chaser (fair enough) with a secret bachelor pad at the "Bed Sullivan Theater." A "Late Show" (or as the Boston Herald now calls it, "Mate Show") staffer told the tabloid all about it.

Skirt-chasing funnyman David Letterman's restricted office at his Midtown studio has all the trimmings for a bachelor on the prowl, including a fold-out couch and a kitchen.

Letterman's production company, Worldwide Pants (and, no, we won't even make the obvious joke about that one), denies that the space is a secret love nest, according to the Post report. The sofabed is just there so he can take a wee snooze when he needs it.

Apparently his TriBeCa apartment is too far away (about 15 minutes by car).

I'm wondering now who's the real slut?  Maybe Letterman should zip his mouth after he zips his pants. 

* * * * * *

Why does Whoopi Goldberg still have a place in the witch's coven also known as The View?  Whoopi described Roman Polansky's crime as being "not rape rape."  What the fig does that mean?  Is she really saying that if 13 year old gives in that it's quasi-consensual sex?  It sounds like the same kind of dumb argument as the perjury light defense ("everybody lies about sex") that Bill Clinton's defenders asserted nearly 10 years ago.  (Psst, hey Lefties, both are still crimes called perjury and statutory rape.)  But maybe, Whoopi's remark is just another case of a Libertine Loving Liberal shooting his or her mouth off about things that they don't know about, e.g., the law.
 
The notion put forth by Hollywood/entertainment lefties that Polansky has suffered enough as a fugitive cowering in his chateau in France is laughable.  Polansky pleaded guilty to the original crime in open court with no coercion except for the fact that he might have felt that a jury probably would have convicted him.  Maybe because of that little fact there is a backlash against supporting Polansky in Hollywood.  And there's still another crime to try Polansky for because of his having fled justice 30 years ago.  But maybe by serving his time that it'll be enough that he won't be able to freely walk the prison yard with the general inmate population. I also doubt that his many artistic awards would do him much good in the clutches of a 350 lb inmate nicknamed Bubbalicious. There wouldn't be any hot tubs, soft music, or quaaludes to soften the pain of being violated.  Some insensitive talking head might quip that it wouldn't be "rape-rape" if that happened.  It would be poetic justice.  Not me.  All I want him to do is his time even if it's in protective confinement.  And I want him to do the same time like any non-celebrity would have to do for the same crime.  As for Whoopi, there's no prison sentence for being felony dumb, but the Court of Public Opinion can sometimes render some very harsh judgments.