 |
Maybe stricter enforcement of the im- migration laws would be a better so- lution. |
The great state of Texas executed illegal immigrant Humberto Garcia Leal on Thursday night despite objections from the Obama regime and former President George W. Bush. Thirty-eight year old Leal was executed for the murder of 16-year-old Adria Sauceda in 1994. Sauceda's nude body was found hours later after he left a party with her. Sauceda was bashed to death with a large piece of asphalt.
And although this human chancre has greatly benefited from his prolonged illegal stay in America since his "terrible twos" days, he was a typical ingrate to the very end. In his final statement, Leal apologized to the victim's family and asked for their forgiveness and then said "One more thing: Viva Mexico, Viva Mexico." He said this, after reaping the benefits of living in the United States for well over thirty years. Funny how guys like Leal always exalt the old country where they never would have done as well as they have in America.
Defense attorneys argued that Texas police and other state authorities did not inform Leal, a Mexican citizen, of his right to consult with Mexican consular authorities. The attorneys and violated the Vienna Convention that guarantees foreign detainees the right to consult with consular authorities of their governments following an arrest or detention. So doesn't this constitute an argument for asking a foreign detainee about his immigration status? How could a street cop give an alleged perpetrator his right to a foreign consular assistance if he can't ask the trigger question to inform a suspected perpetrator of his legal rights?
Defense attorneys argued that Texas police and other state authorities did not inform Leal, a Mexican citizen, of his right to consult with Mexican consular authorities. The attorneys and violated the Vienna Convention that guarantees foreign detainees the right to consult with consular authorities of their governments following an arrest or detention. So doesn't this constitute an argument for asking a foreign detainee about his immigration status? How could a street cop give an alleged perpetrator his right to a foreign consular assistance if he can't ask the trigger question to inform a suspected perpetrator of his legal rights?
We are always hearing sob stories about the valedictorian illegal immigrants that were "innocently" brought here as children to justify passing blanket amnesty and various iterations of the Dream Act. Why not balance those stories with stories of criminals like Leal and the MS 13 gang. But we won't hear those stories because racist Democrats need illegal voters to support their destructive agenda. Racist RINOs will always argue that illegals are doing the jobs Americans won't do. Maybe we can breed a type of American worker similar to those subhumans bred to do undesirable jobs as described in Brave New World. Now there's a solution for illegal immigration.
[Full Disclosure: Nick Nafta is an American citizen of Latino descent born in the United States. Nafta resents the deferential treatment given to illegal immigrant lawbreakers. He especially despises Liberals that play the "Moral Imperative Card" and humbly suggests that they either shut the f*** up or sponsor an immigrant and assume full legal and financial responsibility for their stay in the United States.]
No comments:
Post a Comment