UNCIVIL SPEECH: IT'S THE SAME OLD SH*T, JUST A DIFFERENT DAY.

 



THE BEST OFFENSE IS NOT A BAD DEFENSE , i.e., THE DEMOCRATS OUTWIT THE GOP AGAIN (or how John Boehner got "Khrushcheved").

On today's Sean Hannity Radio broadcast, House Speaker John Boehner was interviewed by Hannity.  Boehner was unusually defensive about the cuts that he supposedly pried out of Obama.  Listening to Boehner, we can see why the GOP is outmatched by the Liberal-Fascist ideologues time and time again.  Boehner conceded the government closure option from the start.  He did not have the stomach to follow through with it.  This gave Obama all the incentive he needed to say "Nope!" to the defunding of Planned Parenthood, i.e., the Baby Butchers that are so concerned about the health of women.  Moreover, Obama was able to save the taxpayer funded Democrat allies, the propaganda organs NPR and PBS.

* * * * * 



Maggie Q as "Nikita" is way hotter than "Fat Boy" Nikita K



Boehner got "Khrushcheved" by Obama, which is a kinder way of saying that he got screwed by Obama.  Obama got Boehner to back-off pushing any funding cuts for Planned Parenthood, NPR, and PBS.  This concession by Boehner was similar to Khrushchev extracting a promise from John F. Kennedy (JFK) during the Cuban Missile Crisis to not invade Cuba in exchange for removal of Soviet ICBMs from Cuba.  Khrushchev snookered JFK into helping him reduce the need for a Soviet military presence in Cuba.  It also gave Castro a reprieve from having to find a way to defend his dictatorship from an invasion by the US or its surrogates. 

The JFK promise assured the Soviet Union of a secure base of operations for the spread of Marxism throughout Latin America.  The legacy of JFK's blunder is found today in the Marxist governments of Hugo Chávez (Venezuela) and Daniel Ortega (Nicaragua).  What will John Boehner's legacy be to the taxpayers of the United States?  It was pretty sorry performance by a politician that was supposed to be a good negotiator. Query: How were the Democrats able to stymie the GOP for six years (2001 - 2006) even though the GOP controlled all three branches of government?  The answer is easy: the GOP's fear of being demonized.  This fear is irrational because the Liberal-Fascist Democrats regularly demonize the GOP anyway. So what did Boehner and the gutless GOP have to lose by doing what the voters sent them there to do?

 *  *  *  *  *



In the remake, Boehner should play the lead. 



Boehner feared that his worst nightmare (in his mind) might come true if he and the House Republicans were perceived as being bad guys.  If the government was shut down, then the Lap Dog media was going to demonize the Republicans for starving old people and killing women seeking to kill their unborn fetuses.  This is a classic example of the weakness of a politician like Boehner that has been in elective office far too long.  They don't see a country anymore, just interest groups.  They pander to these groups and fail to do the right thing for the country as a whole.  This is the best argument for term limits.

But what was the GOP National Committee doing in the meantime?  Bupkis.  As soon as it became known that Obama was willing not pay the American military to protect Planned Parenthood's funding there should have been a massive GOP media blitz hammering away at Obama's twisted priorities.  But the GOP, as always, allowed itself to be slapped around like a prison bitch.  It makes one wonder what the Republican National Committee does with all those contributions?  They probably spent the contributions at a fetish strip club as they did in 2010.  Talk about reckless spending...

Needless to say, prepare yourselves for more disappointment with the GOP when they fold their hand over the raising of the debt ceiling and screw-up next fiscal year's budget.

OBAMA'S BUDGET SPEECH: PLUS ÇA CHANGE, PLUS C'EST LA MÊME CHOSE, i.e., IT'S THE SAME OLD SH*T, JUST A DIFFERENT DAY.





Illustration by Nick Nafta using an element adapted from another work.

Here's a capsulized summary of Obama's budget speech today: blame Bush, raise taxes on the rich, cut the Defense Department budget, and change America into Amerika. 

This sounds like the same old drivel that Obama has been saying for the last two years.  This ideologue won't compromise unless he's challenged.  He's only as brave as the news media lets him be.  So GOP, why not go over his head to the people as Reagan did 20 years ago.  Once you educate them, he will cave.  It's also a good bet that when the going gets tough, Obama will go on vacation. Grow a spine GOP!  Take heart in the words of the immortal Groucho Marx in Duck Soup, "Oh course you know this means war!" Groucho and the rest of us "Groucho Marxists" will thank you.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: IS ANN COULTER AN OBAMA OPERATIVE?

 

©Nick Nafta

Recently on the "Hannity" TV show on the Fox News Channel, Ann Coulter admonished Donald Trump to "drop the birther BS."  The story was featured on Conservativebyte.com. The story contained the following description of the exchange between Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter:

On Monday night’s “Hannity” on the Fox News Channel, Coulter said the “birther” conspiracy has been long debunked by other conservative outlets. “Well, I think maybe I’ve been watching too much Charlie Sheen because Donald Trump seems perfectly sane to me,” Coulter said. “I don’t know where he gets this $2 million Obama has spent to keep his birth certificate — he posted his birth certificate on his web page. I am glad that Donald Trump is bringing it up so that people who haven’t been paying attention and don’t know that the American Spectator, Human Events, Fox News – you know, every conservative outlet has already shot down this rumor, which by the way, was started by the Hillary Clinton campaign.”

You can watch the entire interview on You Tube.  But as much as I admire Ann Coulter, I have to disagree with her a bit on this one.  I'm not dismissive of the issue as readily as Coulter is because of the furtive secrecy surrounding Obama's birth certificate.  It doesn't pass the basic smell test.  Why act like you're guilty of hiding something if you're not guilty of hiding anything?  Especially when it can be easily resolved with a simple release of a full birth certificate.   But prominent Liberals always demand absolute privacy whenever there are sensitive personal issues involved.  Bill Clinton refused to release his medical records.  (The reasons are not entirely clear for Clinton's refusal.)  But his Republican Presidential opponent in 1996, the older Bob Dole had to release his medical records to prove he wasn't infirm.

 

*  *  *  *  *

I don't seriously believe that Coulter is an Obama operative as suggested by some of the reader comments on Conservativebyte.com. She's much too smart to throw in with arrogant not-as-smart-as they-think-that-they-are Liberal-Fascists.  Although if she were an operative, it would one of the greatest con jobs of all time.

This is it!  Proof positive?

This is an issue that does need further clarification by Obama.  Especially after all the sand raised over the eligibility in 2008, of John McCain (born in Panama to US parents),  and in 1968, George Romney (born in Mexico City to US parents),  to run for President of the United States.  As for the document that is causing all the the controversy; the purported Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth leaves a lot to be desired. It has no official signature, no embossed or attached seal, or no essential details of the live birth, like the name of the attending physician.  Moreover, on  the certificate, (pictured to the right), under the father's race is the description "African."  I don't remember in my college Anthropology 101 class any race ever being described as "African."  That was in the mid-1970s, when it seemed like everyone was obsessed with hot button issues like race and racism.  Although modern anthropologists don't use the traditional concept of race anymore--in reality, things haven't changed much in the last 50+ years since the Civil Rights movement started.  

The only other evidence of Obama having been born in Hawaii are birth announcements in two newspapers according to Coulter.  Are there any other hard copies of the newspapers available for ready inspection?  It would also be nice if microfiches of the newspapers were available for viewing at more than one public library in Hawaii.  But I have an open mind on the issue.  Because the consequences to America if Obama were to be something other than what he purports to be is too terrible to imagine--even for the most ardent America haters like most of the MSNBC pundit line-up.

The best evidence of Obama's American birth/citizenship would be a valid birth certificate.  But it would not be a document that looks like it might have been taken from a stationery cabinet and hastily filled-in by a student political intern--and a stupid one at that.  Such a defective document might also have about as much credibility as the phony document that Dan Rather tried to use during the 2004 Presidential Election, to prove that G.W. Bush was AWOL from the National Guard during the Vietnam War.  Presumably, Rather's apparent end game was to affect the election outcome in favor of Democrat candidate John Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran.

But many Liberal-Fascists are sociopathic, Clouseau-like ideologues.  So it shouldn't be too surprising to imagine that in their misguided zeal, that they might from time to time, try to pass badly created documents off as legitimate ones to advance a political agenda.  But I worked in state and local government for almost 20 years and saw some of the dumbest things ever written on official letterhead and other documents by dimwitted government employees.   So the above-mentioned "African" race "mistake" is not beyond credibility as an "honest" bureaucratic mistake.

So all Obama has to do to make "Birthers" look foolish is to show a valid birth certificate.  The kicker is that even Obamabot Chris Matthews of MSNBC wants Obama to release his birth certificate.  But that's not likely to happen because all of Obama's records from first grade through Harvard Law School are sealed airtight.  So what could his handlers be hiding?  Did he fail "coloring books" in the first grade?  They say that the cover-up is worse than the crime.  Imagine that, a failure to color within the lines... a true high crime and misdemeanor.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: COUNTDOWN TO SHUTDOWN OR THE BABY BUTCHERS BLOCK BUDGET



Illustration by Nick Nafta

Suppose that Conservative radio talk show hosts were in any consensus about the cause for the Federal budget impasse.  After listening to several radio talk shows Thursday, it seems that one big stumbling block over the Federal budget is the proposed defunding of Planned Parenthood.  Democrats seem to be firmly dug in their position that sanctioned genocide is sacrosanct.  In that regard, the Liberal Fascists of the Democrat Party are in goosestep with their not-so-distant Nazi cousins in their display of total disrespect for human life.  Socialism seems to sanction state sponsored death mills like concentration camps and abortion clinics. 

Illustration by Nick Nafta

Given the tremendous progress of the technology of birth control over the last 40 years, abortion is rapidly becoming a grisly and superfluous method of birth control.  A lot of science has happened since the 1973 Roe v. Wade US Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion. [See previous post, Anti-Political Weasel Page, Uncivil Speech: The Other Business of Death, February 23, 2011.]  Yet, even while the future of the nation hangs in the balance, Democrats cling desperately to their destructive agenda and abortion while pursuing a strategy to preserve their power.  With their reckless spending, lack of civility, and disrespect for the Constitution, Democrats seem to not care a wit about this country.

Obama is trying to shift the blame for the Democrat's failure to pass a budget by last year's October deadline.  The kicker is that although they had complete control of all three Federal branches of government, no budget was passed.  All this current hoopla wouldn't be happening but for the incompetence and chicanery of Democrats

The blame shifting Political Weasel-in-Chief described the latest Republican funding resolution as a diversionary tactic.  The Republican funding resolution includes complete funding for the Pentagon (military personnel get paid) through the end of the current fiscal year and defunding of Planned Parenthood.   As a result, Obama has said that he will veto the Republican resolution.  Senate Majority Leader and erstwhile nebbish, Harry Reid said in effect that the Republican resolution is a non-starter.  Obama is seeking to blame the Republicans for American soldiers not being paid, even while they're in the middle of three military actions.  This political strategy is flawed, dangerous and disrespectful to the military and the United States of America.

As pointed out by Landmark Legal Foundation's Mark Levin in his Thursday radio broadcast, Presidents Ronald Reagan and even the loather-in-chief of the military, Bill Clinton made sure that the military got paid during the Federal government shut-downs that happened during their Presidential terms.  Obama doesn't need Congressional approval to pay the military.  Both Presidents Reagan and Clinton used their authority as Commanders-in-Chief to pay the military.  There should always be a healthy respect by a nation's leaders for unpaid, potentially desperate men and women skilled with guns.  History shows us many examples of unpaid desperate soldiers turning on their country.  One should never think that it can't happen here. 



UNCIVIL SPEECH: CHILDREN OF THE KORAN (Apologies to Stephen King)

 


Illustration by Nick Nafta

There is consternation among Conservative radio talk show hosts about the burning of the Koran two weeks ago by Florida pastor, Terry Jones.  Reverend Jones burned the Koran following a mock trial of Islam.  And while the Lame Stream Media largely ignored the event--in an inadvertent act of good editorial judgment--the event went viral on the Internet.  During Monday's Sean Hannity Show broadcast, Hannity interviewed, or should we say, browbeat Reverend Jones by repeating over and over again that Reverend Jones' action put American troops in danger and that he (Hannity) would have done as Afghanistan Commander General David Petraeus requested and not have burned the Koran.  Query: Is political correctness slowly seeping into the military and Conservative talk radio?



During the interview with Hannity, Reverend Jones stated that he had cancelled a scheduled Koran burning on the anniversary of 9/11 last year at the request of Defense Secretary Gates, but that this time he wanted to make a point that Islam is a violent religion.  Point taken.  However,  General David Petraeus said Sunday that Jones' actions have compromised U.S. operations in Afghanistan.   So is General Petraeus really saying that erstwhile peaceful Muslims suddenly became violent after the Koran burning?   If so, we must have missed something since 9/11.  


Fair use confirmed by Wikipedia



That bastion of pro-American sentiment, Salon e-zine described Reverend Jones' act as "...just one example among many acts of fringe Islamaphobia in a post-9/11 America."  On the other hand, Muslims protested, sometimes violently, the critical depiction of the Prophet Muhammad in a Danish political cartoon published by the Jyllands-Posten newspaper.  Until the scourge of political correctness began to take hold of our culture, we were spoiled in America in recent years by our almost unbridled free speech.  Now political correctness has spawned accusations of Islamaphobia toward anyone that disagrees with the Islamo-Fascist agenda.

Islamophobia they say?  Truthfully, I'm downright phobic that some Mad Muslim (or Loony Liberal) might attempt to wack me for writing this blog post.  I might even consider going into hiding as Salman Rushdie did during the furor over his novel, The Satanic Verses.  But instilling fear in their enemies is the most powerful tool of terrorists. They do through violent acts or violent rhetoric.  According to the Wikipedia article on Rushdie:

... His [Rushdie's] fourth novel, The Satanic Verses (1988), was the centre of a major controversy, drawing protests from Muslims in several countries. Some of the protests were violent, in which death threats were issued to Rushdie, including a fatwā against him by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, on February 14, 1989...Hardliners in Iran have continued to reaffirm the death sentence. [Citation omitted.] In early 2005, Khomeini's fatwā was reaffirmed by Iran's spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali Khomeini, in a message to Muslim pilgrims making the annual pilgrimage to Mecca. [Citation omitted.] Additionally, the Revolutionary Guards have declared that the death sentence on him is still valid.[Citation omitted.] Iran has rejected requests to withdraw the fatwā on the basis that only the person who issued it may withdraw it, [Citation omitted.] and the person who issued it – Ayatollah [Ruhollah] Khomeini – has been dead since 1989...

If Christians reacted to every act of real or perceived sacrilege, violence would probably envelop and destroy the world.  But with a few exceptions, this has not been the general nature of Christianity since bad old days before the Reformation and after the Spanish Inquisition.  But Christians seem to be resigned to an irritated attitude of quasi-acceptance of the sacrilegious behavior directed against them and seem at times to go out of their way to avoid conflict with their detractors.

The US taxpayer funded National Endowment for the Arts gave artist Andres Serrano part of the $15,000 that he received for his work, Piss Christ.  The work is a photograph of a plastic crucifix submerged in a glass of yellow liquid.  The liquid is described by Serrano as being his own urine.  The photograph was one of a series of photographs that Serrano made involving classical art works submerged in various fluids, e.g., urine.  The work outraged many and some were driven to vandalism.  Although most of the violence was directed toward the art work itself, Serrano also received death threats.  

But there is a disparity between the treatment of Christian religious symbols and Muslim religious symbols.   Sacrilege against Christianity is encouraged and even sanctioned by the American Left.  For example, the Left vigorously defended  Nigerian-born artist Chris Ofili's incorporation of elephant dung into his work, The Holy Virgin Mary.  This begs the question as to what is sacrilegious if not this?  The defenders of Ofili can make excuses such as Ofili's use of elephant dung as a reflection of its importance to his culture. 

Oh yes, I forgot the dung. By now we all should know that in Africa, where the dung idea came from, elephant droppings carry none of the horrible connotations that shit carries in New York. Before offending us all with his own bullshit, Giuliani might have troubled himself to learn about the sacred nature of pachyderms and their dung in other parts of the world.

Despite  art critic Daniel Kunitz's  above-cited artsy-fartsy defense of Ofili, it is intuitive that dung is dung in any culture no matter how "artistic" or "creative" it might seem in its application to a work of "fine art."  There is a reason why  people worldwide use the word "shit" as a pejorative adjective, e.g., "He got the shitty end of the paint brush."   While dung has its practical uses as fuel or as fertilizer, it has a questionable use as a medium used in a sacred religious work of art. 

As a practical matter, Christians have few free speech or religious rights.   They only have the right to be ridiculed and abused because of a perverse activist legal and secular interpretation of the First Amendment.  That perverse interpretation inspires atheists and leftists to disparage Christianity with impunity.  Moreover, political correctness apparently does not apply to religions that the Islamo- and Liberal- Fascists don't like.

But as seen in the first article cited from Salon, any Christian indignation over Muslim acts of sacrilege is dismissed as "Islamaphobia."  This dismissive attitude might take the form of what Barack Obama would describe as bitter Christians clinging to "guns and God."    In a truly just world, wouldn't it be also fair to describe radical Muslims as "bitter" Islamo-Fascists clinging to "bombs and Allah"?

The danger to America is that our right to freedom of speech (and religion) might become a right for only those  acceptable to an oppressive Liberal-Fascist regime.  Free speech must be broadly construed to allow maximum freedom of speech for all.  A full and fair intellectual dialectic between competing ideas is how great ideas emerge.  Otherwise, the intellectually vacant political correctness model becomes a tool of oppression for the powerful and tyrannical few.  When Senator Lindsay Graham states that...

Free speech is a great idea, but we're in a war. During World War II, you had limits on what you could say if it would inspire the enemy. So burning a Koran is a terrible thing, but it doesn't justify killing someone. Burning a Bible would be a terrible thing, but it wouldn't justify a murder. But having said that, any time we can push back here in America against actions like this that put our troops at risk, we ought to do it.

... we're on shaky ground.  So, Senator Graham, please define what endangerment of the troops is.   Because in case I missed something, the Islamo-Fascists in Afghanistan don't need any further inspiration to commit extreme violence  against American soldiers.  It's doubtful that the stupid act of a two-bit Florida preacher in burning the Koran is the root cause of violence against American troops in Afghanistan. 

Senator Graham and General Petraeus both believe that otherwise protected speech must limited if it endangers our troops.   As a lawyer, Senator Graham should know better.  And General Petraeus should stick to military matters and leave politics and legal interpretation  of the US Constitution to civilians and the Courts.  That is, unless he wants to run for President in 2012.

We all know that "free speech" has its limits, i.e., you can't yell "Fire" in a crowded theater and that "fighting words" are not protected speech.   But why should there be any extra special treatment for Islam?  The Constitution says what it means and means what it says.  All religions are up for scrutiny, ridicule, and criticism--no matter how lame or sacrilegious those actions or speech might be toward a given religion.  That is, they are allowed to do so, so long as there is no direct violence against the religion's practitioners or suppression of the religion.

All religions are entitled to equal protection and treatment under the law.  No more or no less is acceptable under our Constitution.  As Thomas Jefferson wrote, "I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."  It is long past due to end the tyranny of political correctness.    



UNCIVIL SPEECH: "We have to arm the Libyan rebels first before we can find out who they are." This is proof that Liberals are the stupidest people on Earth.



Illustration by Nick Nafta

Young associate lawyers are admonished by senior partners in their law firms to "never ask a question that you do not know the answer to." The idea behind that admonition is to prevent embarrassing and unpleasant surprises in front of a jury. They also teach that principle at law schools. President Obama allegedly attended what is considered by many as the premier law school in America--Harvard Law School. Maybe he wasn't paying attention during that particular lecture in his trial techniques class at Harvard. We are now hearing that Obama and the highly esteemed Hillary Clinton--a Yale Law School grad--are now seriously considering arming the Libyan rebels without knowing who they really are or for whom they are really fighting for.

     But yesterday, in a moment of Ivy League elitism, Obama said that there are professionals among the rebels, i.e., doctors, lawyers, and engineers. Hmm, Yasser Arafat was a civil engineer.  Che Guevara was a medical doctor. Fidel Castro is a lawyer. It seems that a professional degree might be a valid credential to be a revolutionary or freedom fighter.  Universities and colleges in the 1960s and the early 1970s were full of revolutionary wannabes. This was especially true in law schools all over the United States. They were all going to "change the world and make a difference."  But maybe there is some credence to having professionals as  revolutionaries toppling a dictator or just being plain old fashion freedom fighters--even if they do end up being the same as the old dictator. (There's a song in there somewhere.)  

     There's also rumored to be temporary outside revolutionaries that are working with the Libyan rebels. This begs the question, is there a temp agency that hires these guys? Does the Robert Half Agency have a division for itinerant insurgents? Does Manpower have a rent-a-revolutionary program? This would be the ultimate outsourcing of a job that Americans should not be doing anyway.  But sooner or later, the nearly bankrupt Uncle Sam will be drawn into the Libyan conflict with pockets pulled inside out.  Do you really think that the toothless British lion and the French surrender monkeys could hack it in Libya?

     The grand naïveté of the modern American leftist is that they assume that because someone has an advanced academic degree that they can be somehow like them, i.e., gooble gobble, we accept him, we accept him, one of us.  Nothing could be further from the truth. Liberals are frat boy pranksters in comparison with hardcore Islamo-Fascist terrorists.  In reality, modern Liberals are coffee house communists with dreams of revolutions where no blood is ever shed and capitalist pigs are banished forever.  Allegedly Lenin once called American leftists "useful idiots." Add to that description naive, and Osama Bin Laden will be laughing his scrofulous ass off in Hell.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: DR. KONSPIRACY EXPLAINS OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY



Illustration by N. Nafta

EDITOR'S NOTE:  The APWP interviewed Dr. Gustav Konspiracy after President Obama's Libya speech on Monday night.  We conducted the interview at the Mengale Institute for Liberal Studies of the Human Mind in Boulevard, California.  Dr. Konspiracy has long studied political dichotomies.  Dr. Konspiracy developed the theory of the Trotsky Two Step Method of Mental Gymnastics in which it possible to simultaneously hold contradictory evil thoughts without guilt or any semblance of a conscience.  In 1985, Dr. Konspiracy conducted a ground breaking study of progressive leftist activists. The control group consisted of registered Democrat voters, Socialist Worker Party members, Communist Party USA members, and public employee and teacher union members.  Dr. Konspiracy selected this group to reflect American mainstream political thought in consultation with advisers from the Disassociated Press, the Crescent News Network, the National Broadcasters for Collectivism, the Collective Broadcasting System, the American Broadcasting Collective, the Partisan Broadcasting Service, and National Partisan Radio.  The experimental group consisted of activist individuals that were militantly for abortion rights (choice) while maintaining strong sentiments against the death penalty for serial killers, brutal rapists, and assorted criminals.  This study led to the crystallization of the Democrat Party Platform in 1992, when Bill Clinton won the Presidency espousing a middle of the road platform while concealing a distinctly socialist agenda.  Obama during the 2008 Presidential Election effectively concealed his Afro-Marxist tendencies while projecting the image of a confident centrist progressive.  Since then Obama has demonstrated at times inconsistent and incoherent behavior particularly when the Presidential teleprompter is in the shop.  Despite his vain attempt to justify his erratic whipsaw foreign policy, Obama failed to clarify his Libya intervention during his nationally broadcast speech on Monday night.  We asked Dr. Konspiracy to help explain the Obama foreign policy paradox.

APWP: Dr. Konspiracy can you explain the recent bouts of indecisiveness by President Obama regarding foreign policy?

DK: There is a popular newly theorized syndrome known as the Kelsey-Grammar syndrome in which an individual appears to be in control, is articulate, and is unfazed by chaotic situations.  Some might describe it as a cool aloofness under fire. In the case of the President, and this is without having examined him personally, he would  appear to be in a dissociative fugue state.  Dissociative fugue may involve unplanned travel or wandering, and is sometimes accompanied by the establishment of a new identity.  In the case of the President, he has had to establish a new identity as a statesman and as a working man... and not just a smooth talking rabble-rousing community organizer.  These are things that he attempted to do earlier in his first autobiography.  He wrote a follow-up autobiography, which did resonate with the lesser educated masses. Meanwhile, the elites began to see him as a potential tool to be used for their ends.  They may be rethinking their choice in light of his recent confused behavior.

APWP: Can you elaborate on dissociative fugue state as it relates to President Obama?

DK  Certainly. Have you noticed that every time there is a crisis that President Obama takes a trip abroad, plays golf, or shoots hoops?  The situation in Libya is on point in that regard.  Obama took off to Rio while Libya was in a state of siege.  Can you imagine Franklin Roosevelt going on vacation during D-Day?  Abe Lincoln going to the theater during the Battle of Gettysburg?  I seriously doubt that LBJ shot hoops during the Tet Offensive.  

APWP: What about the identity aspect?

DK:  Well, that's a real sticking point with me.  I don't want to appear to be a "birther" but the lack of a valid birth certificate complicates the matter.  I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but it would help if he produced a birth certificate, if only just to silence  his critics.  All of us have  a sense of who we are.  We get this from several sources: our family, our friends, and from legal documents like a birth or baptismal certificate.  It's somewhat discomforting to some people that someone wouldn't seek to prove something like where you were born.  To add to the confusion, there's few people that remember President Obama prior to his college and law school years.  In fact, we know little about him except for what's in his two autobiographies.  Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose, I think, had a discussion about this on Rose's PBS show. They said out loud what many of us are thinking.  I wonder really if we are comfortable not knowing much of anything about the individual that is the most powerful man in the world?  All of his records are sealed... from first grade to law school.  It's kind of hard to put your arms around that.

APWP: So how does all of this explain Obama's confused foreign policy?

 

DK: He doesn't have a true sense of himself, i.e., an identity.  His persona has been created by handlers that have scripted his entire life.  Unless the script is there then he doesn't know what to do unless he is told what to do.  He is like an actor that cannot do improvisational theater.  Crises spontaneously pop up.  You can't prepare a script that will anticipate oil spills, revolutions, and natural disasters. Without an understanding of your character--yourself--then you have no coping mechanism that you can fall back on to competently handle a crisis. This causes confusion and hence, the lack of a cohesive foreign policy and a tendency to bury one's head in the sand.

 

APWP: Thank you for your insights Dr. Konspiracy.

______________________

               

Dr. Gustav Konspiracy's latest book, Dr. Konspiracy's Nightmare Theories - Symptoms & Syndromes of Political Figures is published by Wandom Outhouse and will be available in bookstores on April 1, 2011.  It will sell for $29.95.  It is Dr. Konspiracy's twentieth book on abnormal political psychology.  Dr. Konspiracy is the Marquis De Sade Professor of Abnormal Psychology at the Hiram Walker School of Psychology at Wallace C. Wanker University in Walla Walla, Washington.  Dr. Konspiracy is currently a visiting professor at the Mengale Institute for Liberal Studies of the Human Mind in Boulevard, California.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: AMERICAN BLOOD FOR LIBYAN OIL & OTHER WAR CRIMES

Illustration by Nick Nafta

Well, well, well...now the shoe is on the other foot.  Hey Barry, how do you like being called a war criminal by the likes of Ralph Nader?   How do you like being chastised by Louis Farrakhan and Michael Moore?  How does it feel to have put young men and women in harm's way without first getting authorization from the US Congress?



Obama's "mom jeans" must have had some extra starch in them when he allegedly took the advice to go stealth "hawk" in Libya from UN Ambassador, Susan Rice; Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton; and Special Assistant to the President, Samantha Power.  None of these women should ever be confused with Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir.  And like most things Obama does, it was done without authorization. At least, the "evil" George W. Bush asked for permission first before he went to Afghanistan and Iraq. But in 2003, it was, (and stayed that way for 8 years of the Bush Administration), the US policy to effect regime change in Iraq after Bill Clinton signed into law the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998. 

Clinton's words and justification for the policy at the time were not unlike George Bush's "weapons of mass destruction" justification in 2003.  Clinton said:

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow...Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal.

The idea that Democrats are anti-war by nature is a misconception, because Democrats are notorious war hawks if the war is sanctioned by nut case lefties and especially when it looks like easy low risk pickings like Libya or Kosovo.

It's also funny how big time anti-war Libs like John Kerry bought into regime change when Bubba was spouting off, but turned into a dove as the rest of the Democrats did when Bush took the reins of power.  Yeah, yeah, we know Bush lied and people died.  Yup, Abu Ghraib made Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld certifiable war criminals.  And Castro, Mao, Mugabe, Chavez, et al are really humanitarians as are all Marxists.

But we now have an apparent war crime committed by US troops in Afghanistan under Obama's watch.  The publication by the German magazine Der Spiegel of "trophy" photographs of US soldiers posing with the dead bodies of Afghan civilians that they killed makes Abu Ghraib seem tame by comparison. 

The Afghan war is owned by Obama inasmuch as he campaigned during the 2008 election on the issue that Afghanistan was the only war that the US should have been fighting all along.  He spent over six months seeking advice from commanders on the ground. He ignored their advice and didn't provide the additional troop levels that the military commanders recommended were needed to succeed in Afghanistan.  Obama's incompetence has led to the current mess in Afghanistan.

As he did with Afghanistan, the Presidunce also vacillated about Libya because, well he simply doesn't have a clue of how to lead, or to follow.  But he does know how to get out of the way.  Obama does that by hiding out on the golf course, the basketball court, in ESPN's studios, or in Rio de Janeiro. 

The kicker in all this is that the military intervention in Libya is really for the benefit of Britain and France with their desperate need for Libyan oil.  Of course BP (British Petroleum of the Gulf Oil Spill) is involved.  Could this use of American force be tied in with the Gulf victims' fund paid by BP?  Has the BP victim's fund money, like the Stimulus Fund money, disappeared into some political rat hole?  Is American military power is being used to advance the interests of British Petroleum?  They're good questions to think about. 

Meanwhile, let's make our new anti-war slogan, "No American blood for Libyan oil for France and Britain."  Wow, those Libs know how come up with a good template for those bumper sticker slams.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: GILBERT GOTT-FIRED & OTHER DUNCES

Illustration by Nick Nafta

Why do "one trick ponies" that have a good thing going screw it up by being cruel, stupid, or insensitive. The one trick pony troika of Michael Vick, Charlie Sheen, and Gilbert Gott-fired comes to mind.  Vick forfeited a $30+ million NFL contract by running an cruel dog fighting and illegal gambling ring. (The illegal gambling-phobic NFL has since taken him back.  They are total hypocrites.) Sheen boots a $48 million TV contract by being a substance abusing libertine and anti-Semite. Gilbert Gott-fired loses a national spokesmouth gig with AFLAC doing the voice-over for the AFLAC Duck by being an insensitive lout with poor comedic timing. (Voice-over artists take note, a lucrative job is now available if you can demonstrate a semblance of humanity.)

     Each of the above-mentioned dunces should drop to their collective knees--(Marxist lingo)--and thank the Good Lord for their largely undeserved good fortune. Without football, Vick would be just another dog-killing street punk. Without his famous Daddy and acting, i.e., if you can call playing yourself on a TV sitcom "serious" acting, Charlie Sheen would be a drunken doorman at a crack house or a whorehouse.   And finally, Gilbert Gott-fired has shown himself to be little more than another tasteless act in a vulgar freak show for demented children.



Illustration by Nick Nafta

Speaking of dunces, our Presidunce is spending most of his time these tumultuous days playing golf, shooting hoops, and filling out his NCAA college basketball tournament bracket sheet for the Oval Office betting pool.  Meanwhile, Libyan rebels are being slaughtered by Qaddafi, Japan is suffering through earthquakes and nuclear plant meltdowns, public employee unions are destroying state budgets, the U.S. Post Office will be broke by the end of September, gas and food prices are rising meteorically, and there is still no Federal budget after six months.  

     During 2008 Presidential Election, the Presidunce was very vocal in saying that we "took our eye off of the ball" in Afghanistan by going to Iraq.  In two years, we've lost more men in Afghanistan under Obama than in the previous eight years under the hated George W. Bush.  Yet, the Snooze Media no longer runs the little segments where they name the casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to drive home the point that "Bush lied and people died."  When gasoline prices rose in the last six months of 2008, Bush got the blame. Not so with our Presidunce.  He gets off Scot-free.

     At what point does Obama ever become responsible for his actions and non-actions?  Probably never.  This is because the hard bigotry of low expectations is at work. Liberal-Fascists tend to have low expectations of all minorities.  Let's call it the "Great White Father Complex" as WMAL morning talk show host Chris Plante says. 

     White Liberal-Fascists patronizingly declare that Obama is the smartest President ever. In truth,   several Presidents were much smarter, e.g., Nixon, Jefferson, and both Presidents Adams.  Answers.com has a claim that Obama scored high enough on the Law School Admissions Test to qualify for membership in the smart guy organization MENSA.  But we'll never know for sure how smart he is because Obama's records as far back as first grade are sealed.  Hmm, what is he hiding?  Query: How do you flunk coloring in first grade?  Maybe it's the same way Al Gore flunked out of divinity school. (Query: How do you flunk God?)

     If Obama did score high on any standardized test it is probably because he was given the answers by his handlers.  I mean really, a guy that pronounces "corpsmen" as "corpsemen"?  But, maybe that's how they say it at Hahvud or Columbia.  During the 2008 Presidential Election, Obama said that he had been to 57 states in the U.S.!  For the record, there are 57 Muslim states. Maybe that's what our closeted Muslim sympatico really meant.  But Obama got yet another pass for that last one from the Snooze Media because he was probably really "tired" when he said it. Really?

     There are no such excuses for Michele Bachmann, arch-nemesis of Nazi Pelosi, from Liberal-Fascist political thugs like Lawrence O'Dumbbell (O'Donnell).  She is being crucified by O'Dumbbell for misplacing the Battle of Lexington and Concord in New Hampshire instead of Massachusetts.  O'Dumbbell proceeds to insult her congressional district by saying, "Perhaps all of Michele Bachmann's staff comes from her district which may be the most ignorant congressional district in America."  Here's news for you O'Dumbbell, smarter things than you have been flushed down toilets in Congressional districts all over America.  In fact, a single compost pile has far more intelligence than all the Liberal-Fascists combined. OK, so maybe that's hyperbole, but this is the kind of political analysis that we get from the Liberal-Fascist Squawking Heads and from the Snooze Media. 

   Perhaps the solution to all this is--to paraphrase Shakespeare--"The first thing we do, let's kill all the journalists."  Not to worry, no one will die because there are no journalists left in the United States.

UNCIVIL SPEECH: WHEN WILL THIS LONG NATIONAL NIGHTMARE OF INCOMPETENCE BE OVER?





Illustration by Nick Nafta



Our Presidunce has done nothing in retaliation for the four Americans brutally executed by Muslim Somali pirates.  (Like maybe doing the world a favor by bombing Somali pirate strongholds.)

     Obumbler's predecessor George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan probably would have responded with strong military action.  Even that feckless, male chauvinist pig, crypto-socialist, Bill Clinton would at least have returned  a flaccid response to this outrage like when he fired a Cruise missile into Sudanese aspirin factory suspected of being an arms factory.  Unfortunately, Clinton killed an innocent working man (a janitor).  But like Obumbler, Clinton got and would get a Liberal media hypocrite pass every time.

* * * * *

There are several natural disasters throughout the nation that would normally provoke a Presidential declaration of a disaster area or at least a courtesy flyover to inspect the damage. But because the victims like the flooded out Midwestern White Americans aren't a part of his lunatic leftist base he won't/doesn't act--not even in flyover country!

     But Obumbler still has his White House parties and his pick-up basketball games on the weekend.  Tonight's White House party is to watch the Chicago Bulls play the Charlotte Bobcats.  (It's not clear whether the partiers will be bi-partisan or bi-polar.) The food fare will not be the healthy stuff that Michelle Antoinette is trying to shove down our collective, (excuse the Marxist lingo), gullets. You know, stuff like steamed mullet, tree bark, pine cones, and uncooked wild oats.  Instead the bi-partiers will probably get chips, ice cream, pizza, fries, ribs, adult libations, etc.

Kanye!

Kanye West, once described by the Presidunce as a "jackass," said that George W. Bush "hates Black people" apparently for not pushing the secret magic lever in the hidden room in the White House that would have stopped Hurricane Katrina. But the Presidunce's inaction on several natural disaster fronts involving predominately white victims is just as bad, if not worse.

To some, it might also seem that Barack Obumbler hates white people and Christians. Well folks, it looks like Obumbler is a racist and religious bigot. He called his white Grandmother that raised him "a typical white person"!  This is as bad as saying "you people" to a crowd of Black folks.  Obama didn't do a very good of explaining what he meant by "a typical white person."  But using the sliding scale of ethics and morality that most Socialist pigs live by, he'll surely get a pass. 

     But Obumbler is quick to tell us Americans that we should not jump to conclusions about the Balkan Muslim that intentionally killed two American airmen in the name of Islam. This is even though the murderer has confessed to the act of Islamo-terrorism. Obumbler also said the same thing when another Muslim domestic terrorist, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, shot up his fellow soldiers at the Fort Hood, Texas army base. Why this kid glove treatment of wrongdoing Muslims?

     Of course it was not "jumping to conclusions" when Obumbler called a Cambridge, Massachusetts cop "stupid" for arresting a Black Harvard professor for disturbing the peace.  As it turned out that the cop acted ethically and professionally and was vindicated--so much for a post-racial America. Eric Holder, perhaps the most incompetent, Fascist US Attorney General since Woodrow Wilson's AG Alexander M. Palmer, allegedly will not prosecute Black voting rights offenders. Is it because they're his people--so much for Equal Protection under the law.  But these crypto-Marxists have never respected the US Constitution.

    
* * * * *

    

Gasoline prices are meteorically rising, but Presidunce Obumbler does nothing as the Red Chinese, Cubans, and Venezuelans drill off our coast, but maybe that's just professional Marxist courtesy being extended to his fellow socialist pig travellers.  He has wanted to tap in to the strategic reserve but that would be stupid because the reserve is meant for real emergencies not for political expedience.  The latest line is that gasoline prices are rising because of the unrest in Libya.

     On a recent radio newscast, ABC News [sic] tried to shore up our girlie man Presidunce's machismo by pointing out that Obumbler mentioned by name Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi (Kadafi) three times in telling him he had to go. Ooh, Gaddafi is shaking in his desert booties!  Why didn't Obumbler do that with Ahmadinejad of Iran?  Hmmm, maybe he's a fellow traveler of Ahmadinejad?

     Our girlie man Presidunce must have have had on his best heavily starched "Mom Jeans" on when he was calling out Gaddafi. (BTW, is there a correct spelling for Gaddafi?  The Christian Science Monitor has a good article in that regard.) The confusion over the spelling of the Libyan strongman's name is the least of the problems for Obumbler's Secretary  of State  incompetent silly head Hillary Clinton.  If Gaddafi survives this uprising, and it looks increasingly that he may; then Obumbler might finally be unmasked as the incompetent officious meddler that he is.  We wait with baited breath for the unmasking of the meddler.

NPR (National Partisan Radio) and its evil sister PBS (Partisan Broadcast Sham) are more like propaganda ministries than news services, i.e., they are to journalism as Woodpeckers are to carpentry.    

UNCIVIL SPEECH: THE OTHER BUSINESS OF DEATH

Death is big business in the United States.  But this post is not about the American funeral industry, which is a legitimate and necessary industry.  This is about Planned Parenthood.  They are in the business of state-sanctioned genocide. Ever since Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) "legitimized" abortion, over 50 million unborn children have been slaughtered.  Some have been slaughtered using one the most vile methods--partial birth abortion--that is reminiscent of the human experiments by the "Angel of Death"--the Nazi Dr. Josef Mengale.

Proposed new McDeath-style signage for Planned Parenthood.  Illustration by N. Nafta

The Republican controlled House of Representatives recently voted to defund Federal funding for Genocide Inc., also known as Planned Parenthood.  The Wikipedia entry for Planned Parenthood reads more like a public relations press release than an accurate, comprehensive history of Genocide Inc.  

Should s/he be aborted if s/he is a racist?

     There are those that believe  that Planned Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger was a racist.  One of my Black friends also sincerely believe that abortion was legalized by the Supreme Court in the hope that minorities would self-exterminate themselves out of existence. If this is true, then it would have been a sort of "benign" final solution by the true racists, the Liberal-Fascists of the mid-20th century.  Here's an item for Black History Month. According to the Margaret Sanger Papers research project by the New York University, History Department:

The Negro Project, instigated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, was one of the first major undertakings of the new Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA), the product of a merger between the American Birth Control League and Sanger's Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau, and one of the more controversial campaigns of the birth control movement. Developed by white birth control reformers, who consulted with African-Americans for help in promoting the project only well after its inception, the Negro Project and associated campaigns were, nevertheless, widely supported by such black leaders as Mary McLeod Bethune, W. E. B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Influenced strongly by both the eugenics movement and the progressive welfare programs of the New Deal era, the Negro Project was, from the start, largely indifferent to the needs of the black community and constructed in terms and with perceptions that today smack of racism. [Emphasis added.]

It would seem however, that Sanger was more interested in eugenics than in being a foremother of the National Socialist Party head honcho, Adolph Hitler, the Master Racist.  But the racism in Sanger's Black Project is implicit and insidious.  It's the old "doing something bad while making it look like a good thing" schtick.

     But the modern party line from Planned Parenthood is that they are primarily interested in women's health issues.  Never mind that they concentrate on, and make most of their revenue from abortions.  Apart from the moral/ethical implications of legalized abortion and answering the bio-ethical question of when life begins, (notwithstanding any reference to our pay grades); the real hot button issue here is whether American taxpayers should fund state-sanctioned genocide.  (Psst: The correct answer is NO!) 

     Even without Federal funding, Planned Parenthood would not be left out the financial cold.  They could always seek deductible charitable contributions from its wealthy Liberal supporters.  Although, the charitable contribution deduction is an indirect taxpayer subsidy, it is certainly a more palatable one than the current direct subsidy by the U.S. government.  (NN Note: Obama wants to eliminate the charitable deduction.)

     What offends many people about abortion is that some women use it as another form of birth control. The most common justification for abortion is that it is more convenient to abort a pregnancy than to screw-up a career or one's other lifetime plans.  Since 1973, when Roe v. Wade was decided, birth control medical technology has advanced to the point where--except rape or incest--there really no excuse for involuntarily or carelessly getting pregnant.

     Here are 12 methods for avoiding pregnancy including the oft-ridiculed abstinence choice.  These methods are in no particular order of preference or endorsement:

1. Male Condom
2. Female Condom
3. Diaphragm (used with spermicidal gel or cream)
4. Cap (used with spermicidal gel or cream)
5. Sponge (infused with spermicidal gel or cream)
6. Spermicidal [creams, gels or pessaries (dissolvable tablets)]
7. The IUCD or coil
8. Natural Family Planning (a.k.a., the Rhythm Method, possibly reliable with a Persona device that check temperature and hormonal levels, but somewhat similar to the No. 9 Baby Roulette method below.)
9. The Withdrawal Method (Baby Roulette)
10. Sterilization (Men or Women can do this)
11. The Pill (Hormonally based and highly effective, but if taken for a long period of time, the body becomes convinced that you do not want to be pregnant.  This is frustrating for couples that have decided that they want a baby as their biological time clock relentlessly ticks away.)
12. Abstinence (100% effective but thumbed at by Liberal-Fascists as "spoiling" the party for women.)

 All of these choices are readily available from Planned Parenthood, free clinics, and most medical doctors.  As an aside, a man acts irresponsibly when he fails to use any contraception when the woman has not taken precautions in that regard.  If you play, you eventually pay one way or another.  But it not the purpose of this blog entry to dictate the private sexual conduct of people, except when it involves the protection of the most defenseless lives in our society.

     The Sociopath-in-Chief, President Obama, has said the he would not want his daughters to be punished with an unwanted baby.  But if we attempt to follow the President's twisted logic; such a pregnancy would be a "mistake" that we could simply abort and throw away in a medical waste bin.  No wonder the Sociopath-in-Chief never finds himself above his moral and ethical pay grade.