There is a scandal brewing in the Global Warming "scientific community" that has many people's slimy carbon fingerprints all over it. It seems that the Global Warming (a.k.a., Climate Change) "scientific" data is "fake" and isn't worth the paper that it's written on. In 1,079 emails and 72 documents that were hacked from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) e-mail system, we have come to find that there has been collusion and destruction of documents, as well as the intimidation and suppression of contrary views or by boycotting of journals that publish contrary views. We can see the obvious conspiracy by the Leftist Environmental Movement to use this hoax to impose control over every aspect of our lives.
The New York Times to its eternal discredit has indicated that it will not publish these 1,079 emails and 72 documents because in their words:
The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted here.
Oh really? What did the New York Times consider The Pentagon Papers? Weren't they classified documents that weren't intended for public consumption. If memory serves weren't they illegally obtained by theft by Dr. Daniel Ellsberg. This is an example of the selective morality of the Left. They will always excuse their pecadillos but never anything, however minor of their enemies real or imagined. Their ire has always been directed to big corporations that are the bane of all good Leftists.
Make no mistake, the Left is as greedy and ruthless as any 19th Century Robber Baron. For example, Al Gore, the Climate Change Flim Flam Man, is certainly not in need of any more money, got $529.7 million in grant funds to build environmentally friendly cars in Finland of all places! What about unemployed Americans that need jobs? Well, the ugly truth is that Liberals don't give a damn about the little guy! Especially if scam income is involved where a Liberal crook is able to invest someone else's money. In this case it's taxpayer's money that was given to the über scam artist Gore.
Democrats/Liberals/Socialist are always the first ones to yell "hypocrite" at Republicans and Conservatives that do not live up to phony superhuman standards as defined by the Left. Yet, they are the first ones to make dozens of excuses for their screw-ups and flaws. Take for example this justification entitled, Al Gore: "Carbon Billionaire"? from the This is Diversity v 1.0 blog for the corpulent Gore's ascent to carbon-based wealth while pushing this Global Warming/Climate Change scam:
Conservatives are accusing Gore of profiting off of the very causes he's built his career on since leaving office in 2001. As a partner at a venture capital firm that invests in green energy innovators, Mr. Gore has developed a reputation among his supporters as a man who puts his money [sic] where his mouth is. But when one of those investments stands to receive more than $500 million in a new government grant for developing smart grids, some people see a conflict of interest.
In other words, is Al Gore using the green revolution he helped start to get rich?
If you think this is a new question, think again. People have been speculating about Gore's sincerity for years, and this latest development merely proves that whenever a man of great influence makes a difference, there will always be those who shout "Hypocrite! Sell-out! Liar!" from their rooftops.
Should Gore's wealth be our primary concern here? Why do people care? If his efforts are helping the environment and generating a profit, isn't that a win-win for everyone involved? If he continues to make money by investing in green energy, then others with capital will join him and create more green investment opportunities and jobs that benefit the global economy as well as global ecology. Isn't that a good thing? [DK: In other words, the end justifies the means.]
Remember that old Adolph and boys--(DK: i.e., the National Socialists and purveyors of mass pseudoscience--think Nazi Dr. Mengale's "scientific experiments")--also used the Machiavellian concept of the "the ends justify the means" also sometimes called consequentialism. But Al Gore shows his hypocrisy in other ways by not walking the walk while allegedly talking the talk. For example, while exorting others to leave a small carbon footprint Gore ran up a $30,000 electric bill for his mansion. But Al Gore assuages his environmentalist guilt by living a "carbon neutral" lifestyle by buying carbon credits from a company he owns. This modern equivalent of the indulgences sold by the Catholic Church in the 1500s and leading to the Protestant Reformation.
And this is the whole point of this Global Warming/Climate Change hoax and conspiracy--plutocrats like Gore will continue to prosper while you sacrifice and pay higher taxes. Fortunately, there are consequences including legal action against these fraudmeisters. But as we know with drug cartels and the global warming conspiracy, only the mules will get caught.
No comments:
Post a Comment