METROSEXUALS OR POLITICIANS?

Anyone that has paid any attention to the recent Republican Presidential Candidate Derby can't help but wonder where's the substance?  Remember the old 1984 Wendy's Commercial "Where's the Beef?"  Well it seems that at times this race is about nothing but beef, i.e., beefcake and sometimes a little cheesecake.  Until Mitt Romney began putting his foot in his mouth by adopting Liberal views on global warming and unions, he was considered the ultimate Republican stud muffin.  Enter Rick Perry and we may have a real hair competition not seen since the hair poofs John Kerry and John Edwards were the Democrat Presidential ticket in 2004.   Republican Mitch Daniels was pinged upon because he's short, balding, and boring! 

*   *   *   *   *



Does anyone care that they're

both intelligent women?



As mentioned earlier, there's plenty of cheesecake too!  You can now purchase a 2-pack of "Babes in the White House" bumper stickers featuring Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.  A classic way of eliminating the competition when you can't beat them with ideas is to trivialize them.  The methods used by the Democrats to eliminate capable Conservative women are at times reprehensible.  One method is to play the "pretty face but no substance" angle.  So far this hasn't really worked because both women are articulate and could hold their own against the teleprompter assisted Obama.  In the case of Palin, she has been subjected to legal harassment, libel and slander, and a vicious Lame Stream Media hate campaign that has not been seen since the Nazi pornographer, Julius Streicher put out the anti-Semitic Der Stürmer.  

Bachmann is beginning to feel the effects of the Liberal-Fascist media hate machine.  The Media is nitpicking her every word to make her appear to be, as Chris Wallace on Fox News put it, "a flake."   For a bunch that claims to be enlightened and non-sexist, the Democrats and the Coastal elites are the biggest knuckle dragging troglodytes ever to trudge the surface of the Earth.  What's ironic about these sexist attacks by the Left is that both women are examples of the feminist icon as postulated by such feminist multimedia as Ms Magazine in the 1970s.  Both Palin and Bachmann are independent, intelligent, have families, successful careers, and genuinely seem to love their husbands.  In other words, they have it all because they are closer to the average American woman than Michelle "Antoinette" Obama.  And unlike most Liberal women, they've earned their success based on their own hard work.  The average Democrat female "success story" is based upon connections and not character.  Hillary Clinton hitched her wagon to Bill Clinton.  Nancy Pelosi came from a prominent Baltimore, Maryland political family.  Scratch a female Kennedy public figure and well, you find a Kennedy.

*   *   *   *   *

Alleged Conservative pundit, David Brooks endorsed the candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama because he liked the crease of his pants.  Chrissy Matthews felt a thrill up his leg whenever Obama spoke.  Is there some sort of political bromance going on here or is this just hyper-educated coastal elite talk?    It also sounds very metro sexual because it is superficial and not substantive.  It seems as if it's more important what clothes are in a candidate's closet than the skeletons in his closet.  Something sure looks like it's in the closet and it ain't designer suits, shoes, or skeletons.

What is hate speech?

What is hate speech?  According to Answers.com, it is "Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group. The article points out that the United States is unique among the judicial systems of the world in extending broad protection to such speech. Evidently, university speech codes were developed with the 1942 Supreme Court case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire in mind. 

Chaplinsky established the "fighting words" exception to determine whether the offending speech is protected or not. The court opined that, "...as those [words] that neither contributed to the expression of ideas nor possessed any social value in the search for truth and that incited an immediate, violent response.  Sounds a lot like the old "no redeeming social value" test found in obscenity cases.  And like obscenity, fighting words are in the eye of the beholder.

Hate speech as defined by the Liberal-Fascists is a different animal. It is a tool by which they supress any opposition to their agenda.  Hate speech, therefore,  is any criticism of Obama's agenda by equating the agenda with Obama himself.  Perhaps the master stroke by the Democrats was in nominating Obama instead of Hillary Clinton for the presidency.  Yet somehow, the press handling of Obama with kid gloves smacks of racism, i.e., the soft bigotry of low expectations.  Chris Matthews epitomizes this institutionalized media bigotry.  Watch this little exchange between Matthews and his fellow Leftist media stooges, Keith "Mr. Depends" Olbermann and Rachael "Mad Dog" Maddow.

Gee, Chrissy, did you forget that Obama is half white? No, I wouldn't have expected anything less stupid from a half-wit like you.  This patronizing attitude by white Liberal-Fascists fits the definition of hate speech because it's reflective of a deep seated bigotry.  These are the most dangerous bigots because they are political sociopaths dressed in sheep's clothing.  

 

Color Blind and Empty Headed (corrected)

How does an immature and very silly guy keep a serious media job when he continually says colossally stupid things?  Pangender political talking head Chrissy Matthews said during the post mortem of Obama's State of the Minion Address, “...[that Obama] is post-racial by all appearances. You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour.”  Have you had your eyes examined recently Chrissy?  What did you mean by that condescending stupid remark Chrissy?  Are you implying that blacks per se are inferior?
 

There are two ways to judge Chrissy's remark. Either the remark is so stupid so as to cause one to question how an individual with an apparent room temperature IQ got so far in life?  This assumes that the room temperature was taken in an igloo in Northern Alaska.  Or is it as I suspect, that this is just another example showing that most Liberal-Fascists are closet racists.

Joe Biden is infamous for having said, "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."  Now I might be persuaded to give "Old White Joe" the benefit of the doubt because he’s probably too dumb to do the mental gymnastics that it takes to be a hardcore racist.  What lame brain Biden probably meant to say was that Obama is a "clean-cut" guy.  That was a popular term during the 1950s and early 1960s.  Yeah, I might have given him the benefit of doubt had not Biden said, "You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent....I'm not joking."

 

Liberals are the gentler side of the same coin as hardcore racists.  They have the same condescending attitude toward "people of color" that the racists that they claim to hate have. Rudyard Kipling said it best in his poem, White Man's Burden. The poem was written in response to the American takeover of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War. The initial stanza of Kipling's poem is poignant: 

Take up the White Man's burden--

Send forth the best ye breed--

Go bind your sons to exile

To serve your captives' need;

To wait in heavy harness,

On fluttered folk and wild--

Your new-caught, sullen peoples,

Half-devil and half-child.

Indeed. "Half devil and half child" is how many smarmy white Liberals like Biden and Matthews appear to view minorities.  We could also add Harry Reid to the mix with his left handed praise of Obama. Factor in  Hillary Clinton's and Jimmy Carter's alleged anti-semitism and we are getting a truer picture of white Liberal elitists with a bigoted weltanschauung.  

Liberals are usually shocked whenever they encounter any minority with a fighting chance at a three digit IQ.  In my own experience, the "new" wife of my former brother in law was "shocked" last May to learn that I had a real college education and a solid career path. It was the first time that we'd met so I'm sure that she had her preconceptions.  Perhaps her perception of, or experience with Hispanics is based upon a stereotype of us as domestic or agricultural help.  But before I go any further please note that there is nothing wrong with good honest work. 

In an interesting discussion thread, former Secretary of State, Colin Powell, is quoted as saying that "all work is honorable" referring to the time that he swept floors at store in New York City.  I would amend General Powell's statement to exclude terrorists, criminals, and politicians.  I have more respect for prostitutes than politicians, because unlike politicians they appear to deliver on their promises most of the time.  Unfortunately, these women are among the most exploited workers in America. 

On the other hand, there is another group of  workers that are being exploited.  If I ever had a gripe against Cesar Chavez it's that he never envisioned his union members as aspiring toward upward mobility.  Instead, his union has turned into a corrupt family run enterprise that has little interest in the welfare of the farm workers.  This is yet another example of the soft bigotry of low expectations.  Chavez saw his union's members as nothing more than dues paying migrant farmworkers.  Chavez had no vision for the betterment of them.  This is the essence of the Liberal mindset.  They speak of hope but offer nothing more that illusory change.  As we know intuitively, hope is an excuse to do nothing while one waits for the illusory change.  This almost as frustrating as watching Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot.

This brings us back to Obama.  He is the most protected political figure in American history. We know nothing about him except for what he's told us in his two books, one of which is rumored to have been written by American domestic terrorist and Hugo Chavez soulmate, Bill Ayers. The leftist view on this topic is in the Huffington Post and the conservative view is in the American Thinker.  Whatever the true authorhip of the books is, Obama is the perfect stalking horse for the imposition of Marxist socialism.  By using a "black" man to try to advance their Marxist agenda, the Democrats have the perfect cover to disguise their totalitarian goals.  If their Marxist agenda is challenged then the response by the Democrats will be that the critics are "racist" and that they want the first "black" President to fail.

We've been told that Obama is the smartest man ever to be President.  In reality, that distinction belongs to John Quincy Adams,  who unlike Obama spoke several languages.  Obama is probably a clever con artist with an above average IQ.  But we'll never know for sure because all of his school and other records are sealed. Why? What is there to hide?  Obama was the President(editor) of the Harvard Law Review and taught at the prestigious University of Chicago Law School, yet he's never produced one word of legal scholarship.  We don't even know if he's a real US citizen. It apparently takes more documentation of one's identity and background to buy a cell phone than it  does to become President of the United States.  Were Obama the real deal, all he would have to do is to show his birth certificate and Obama would embarass the hell out of lots of people and make them look like total fools and racist jackasses.

But the soft bigotry of low expectations will never allow the truth to emerge, as we wait and hope  for change.  Until their goals are reached the Democrats have a vested interest in maintaining Obama's deep cover. The truly sad thing is that Obama is just a puppet of the most vile racists in the history of humankind.